Blog
We are committed to providing customers with high-quality and low-price steel products as its goal, and strives to create value for customers as its own responsibility.
In industrial applications, the selection of stainless steel pipes directly impacts engineering safety and service life. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the differences in corrosion resistance and pressure rating standards between 304 and 316 stainless steel pipes, helping procurement personnel choose the optimal solution based on media characteristics and operating conditions. As a professional steel supplier, we offer specific selection recommendations for common corrosion problems in the chemical and energy industries.
When selecting industrial-grade stainless steel pipes, corrosion resistance and pressure rating are two key indicators. 304 stainless steel pipes contain 18% chromium and 8% nickel, making them suitable for general corrosive environments; while 316 stainless steel pipes have an additional 2% molybdenum, performing better in chloride environments. According to the ASTM A312 standard, in a 5% salt spray test, the corrosion rate of 316 stainless steel pipe is more than 60% lower than that of 304. Pressure ratings should be referenced against the ASME B36.19 standard, with common specifications such as Sch40 and Sch80 directly affecting wall thickness and pressure capacity.
Many engineers have common misconceptions when selecting the pressure rating of stainless steel pipes: firstly, they believe that a higher pressure rating is always safer, but in reality, excessively thick pipe walls can increase flow resistance by more than 20%; secondly, they neglect the effect of temperature on material strength, as the allowable stress of 304 stainless steel decreases by 15% at 200℃; and thirdly, they fail to consider vibration factors, which means that specifications above Sch80 should be selected in applications such as pump stations. We recommend performing precise calculations according to the ASME B31.3 process piping code, rather than simply applying empirical values.
For extremely corrosive environments, conventional 304/316 stainless steel pipes may not meet the requirements. In media containing more than 500 ppm of chloride ions, duplex stainless steel 2205 pipes are recommended, with a pitting resistance equivalent number (PREN) of over 35, which is 1.5 times that of 316 stainless steel. For high-temperature and high-pressure applications, Incoloy 800 series alloy pipes can be considered, as they maintain good mechanical properties even at 600°C. Maxwell Steel can provide customers with specialized piping materials that meet the NACE MR0175 standard for resistance to sulfide stress cracking.
Q: How can you determine if a stainless steel pipe has undergone intergranular corrosion?
A: This can be detected using the ASTM A262 Practice E copper-copper sulfate test. If cracks appear in the weld area, it indicates that the material is sensitized. We recommend solution annealing the stainless steel pipe after welding to avoid this problem.
Q:Can thin-walled stainless steel pipes be used in high-pressure systems?
A:The minimum wall thickness must be calculated according to the ASME B31.3 formula, taking into account the corrosion allowance. Our engineers can provide free calculation services to ensure that the selected specifications are both safe and economical.
Q:What precautions should be taken when using stainless steel pipes and carbon steel pipes together?
A:Insulating flanges must be used to prevent galvanic corrosion; the connecting components we provide for the stainless steel channel bars already have a built-in insulating layer.
GET A QUOTE